Arsenal Vision logo Arsenal Vision

The Arsenal fans site for true Gooners

Articles

Written by Squid Boy on Saturday, 03 September 2011 07:52

I spent yesterday evening watching England beat Bulgaria away. Okay that’s a half-truth. I spent the evening watching Theo Walcott.

Ah yes, good old young Theo. I can’t remember a player who has split the fanbase so much with regards to his best position on the pitch. Wide midfielder? Winger? Striker? All of the above? It’s a very subjective answer and opinions are varied across the Goonerverse.

But in all honesty, only the opinion of two men count – Theo Walcott and Arsene Wenger.

Intriguingly enough, the Club list him as a “striker”. That is all fine and dandy when you consider how high up the pitch he plays. But if you look at Andrey Arshavin’s profile – a man who plays in the same position but on the opposite flank – he is listed as a midfielder. Hmmm. And I would wager a fair amount of money that Samir Nasri was also listed as a midfielder, despite spending the vast majority of last season on the wings.

The man naturally sees himself as a striker and always has done. Through his developmental years he accepted that he was being groomed for the centre-forward position. But as time progresses it’s understandable that he gets itchy feet for the role. With every finish that nestles in the bottom corner, his hunger grows. He wants to be in that position more often and do what comes most naturally to him. Forget blazing past hapless defenders with the ball at his feet or delivering inch-perfect crosses – Theo is a finisher.

Donning the famous no.14 on his back, comparisons to a certain Thierry Henry are inevitable. And I can see it to some extent – their pace (obviously) and style of finishing; the way they open their body to curl the ball around the keeper’s left hand. But Theo has nothing of Henry’s strength or, to put it bluntly, skill set. Indeed, I regard young master Walcott more akin to Michael Owen. Small, extremely nippy and with a nose for goal. Can you imagine Michael Owen playing as a winger? Nope, thought not.

Nary does an interview with him or an article about him go by without mention of the role he craves. All the moreso when the goals start to flow frequently, as they are doing now.

And it’s not just Theo or journalists or fans who are championing his cause. Even his international team-mates have jumped on the bandwagon. In the build-up to last night's game, a story broke in that Express that Theo ran riot in a practice match, bagging a whopping four goals. The story further went on to claim that John Terry – who was on the receiving end of the four goals – actually asked Theo: “how are you not playing up-front for Arsenal?”

The reason is obvious – our formation. Make all the cases you want about Theo playing up top, but he simply can’t do the job that Robin van Persie does. The way we function, we need our frontman to hold the ball up and link play. So far I’ve seen little evidence of either in Theo’s artillery. People will then say that he could simply play on the shoulder, but given the way teams park the bus against us (especially at The Emirates), space in behind will be at a premium and the way he stretches the game for us is vital.

In addition, how often did Michael Owen play up-front on his own? Owen tended to function best when he had a Heskey alongside him, and it comes as little surprise that Andy Carroll was partnering Theo in the aforementioned training session. Don’t worry, I’m not advocating that we go out and buy a lumbering oaf to get the best out of Theo. Far from it. But I am stating my belief that Theo cannot play as the lone striker in our current system.

The 4-3-3 was very much set up with Cesc in mind. It unburdened our ex-captain of the defensive duties that come with being part of a two-man central midfield and allowed him to play a freer role further up the pitch. When Cesc departed I was sad but not fearful of the future, for I believe he had made us tactically inflexible simply because he was undroppable. In his absence, I felt we would be able to sometimes revert to 4-4-2. A tigerish midfield duo of Wilshere and Song flanked by any number of wide midfielders, with v.Persie playing in a second striker role behind a more direct forward. A candidate for this centre-forward role would have included Theo.

However pre-season set the stall out for this campaign, as not once did we adopt this tactic. This may be due to the fact that Cesc was still employed by the Club and Wenger harboured hopes that he’d stay, or that we were going to stick to our 4-3-3 guns irrespective of the Spaniard’s future.

And now with the signing of another Spaniard in Mikel Arteta, it seems that the en vogue formation of a double pivot backing up a more advanced creator shall prevail. So Theo’s coveted forward role looks highly unlikely this season.

Now here’s where I start to worry. Theo has always come across as sweet boy off the field and perhaps a little meek on it. At the very beginning of the season I saw a fired up Theo who was tired of being bullied by defenders. He gave as good as he got and argued back to referees. I even remember commenting on Twitter that I was loving this newfound feisty side to him. No more Mr Nice Guy.

But then after the Liverpool game, I wondered whether we were mistaking his feistiness with petulance. I cannot remember the incident, but there was a moment during the match where he came off looking like a spoilt brat. And I started to wonder – has his positional frustration started to manifest in his on-pitch behaviour. Is he getting annoyed that he constantly receives the ball tight to the touchline and can do little more than run up a blind alley?

Then came the argument with youngster Carl Jenkinson at Old Trafford in the lead up to Ashley Young’s first goal. Now I know Theo is no veteran and sometimes a telling off is required, but maybe he should have recognised his senior standing in the squad and not been so harsh on Jenkinson. Easy to say in hindsight, I know, but I can’t help feel that Jenkinson distracted mindset may have seen him lose track of his man...none other than the goalscorer, Ashley Young.

And this is all on the pitch, for I have yet to mention Theo’s new autobiography. Aside from the fact that releasing an autobiography at the tender age of 22 is rather preposterous, apparently some things he say in it come across as less than flattering – particularly towards a certain Mr Capello. Of course autobiographies should contain the whole truth and nothing but, but again you go back to the starting point – why release one when your career is still active at the risk of alienating people that are important to you? It comes off a bit Billy Big Boots, does it not? Allied with the on-pitch stuff I have mentioned above, it gives rise to the question: has Theo Walcott become a bit of a prima-donna? Worryingly, his current is due to run out in a few summers’ time...

Before you start accusing me of initiating a witch-hunt for Theo, I’d like to make it known that I like Theo. A lot. I bought his no.14 jersey from a season’s back and I have a signed no.32 shirt of his from when he first broke onto the scene. Like an excitable idiot I even purchased the no.23 England kit that he wore to the 2006 World Cup (or rather, that he didn’t wear). And I rate him highly too. I reckon he’s the best finisher at the Club.

My call is simply for Theo to channel his frustration in a more positive manner.

The signing of Arteta perpetuates the usage of a 4-3-3. But Theo should remember that his best form for the Club came in the middle of last season during the wonderful purple patch that shall forever be known as Theo Van Nasregas. (a single tear rolls down my cheek as I recall those halcyon days)

And he should also know that Theo Van Nasregas could well be replicated with Robin dropping deep and creating space centrally for Theo to run onto passes from Jack Wilshere and Arteta. Plus another string to the bow is the ability and tendency that Theo and Gervinho have to swap wings. This will often see Theo cutting in from the left side onto his favoured right-foot. All in all, the formation and players we have can see Theo flourish again this season. And to be fair to the boy, he has started pretty well.

So I ask Theo to stick to his guns this season. Accept that your time in the centre will be thoroughly limited, don’t let your frustration boil over, and make the most of the opportunities that come your way from the wider areas. Essentially, embrace the variety and fluidity of our front three and appreciate the creativity of our midfield. Get in front of goal as often as possible and be so clinical that Arsene can’t envisage not having you in that position at every given opportunity. If you want the formation tailored to you strengths in the future, show us why now.

Squid Boy - Follow me on Twitter

Fancy writing your own articles for fellow Gooners to read? Click Your Vision section.

Register with Arsenal Vision and officially join the debate

Comments (13)

  • RmanGoon  - Really?
    avatar
    Theo's our best finisher? Have you not seen RvP, or our new guy Chu young even

    Who's to say Theo's place is safe with Chu here now? He scored a hattrick for his national team. RvP also scored 4 for his national team. And Theo scored 4 in practice.... What about Gervinho aswell?


    Theo will have to fight for his place on the pitch this year. He has no chance of moving into RvP role...
  • Zama
    avatar
    Good one as always, SB. Fact of the matter is I too was expecting a bit more flexibility in formation this season, but on evidence of the preseason we are stuck with 4-2-3-1. Arsene never changes formations mid-campaign, or does he. Because, if my memory serves me right we played a variation of our current foemation towards the end of 08-09 campaign when Cesc returned from injury. So we shall see where Theo's situation takes him & us
  • Angel D  - Fight 4 a spot, Theo!
    avatar
    Theo shud focus on starting regularly wit d keen competition now in d team. D manager knows his strength and weaknesses and thus plays him where favours d club and not d player. I hope 2 c d best of a hungrier Theo dis season.
  • MeanLean
    avatar
    Great piece Squid Boy and I agree with everything above. I have certainly noticed the petulance from Theo over the last couple of seasons not just on the pitch but some of what he says in interviews comes across as a little arrogant at times. That quiet humble boy is slowly starting to vanish away.

    I also like Theo, love that he gives us that other option when the team are a little square in their passing at times but I am getting a little fed up of hearing the 'I'll play where the boss wants me but I am a striker' talk that we hear every interview.

    I don't want to have a go at the lad but surely he has a little more sense than that. Surely he can see the formation we play and that the player playing as the 'false nine' not striker is far superior to him in every way but pace.

    What frustrates me even more is that his current position would suit him far more than at center forward if he implemented it properly. Since we moved to a variation of 4-3-3 he has never been a winger. He is a wide striker with licence to make runs off the back of full backs and central defenders. He would rarely get that if he played in Robin's position. Both central defenders would drop off and now allow any space in behind and he would be tightly marked game in game out.

    Can anyone imagine Theo bringing down a fizzed in pass into his feet, shield the ball and then have the vision as well as the execution to flick a perfectly weighted pass to a diagonal running Gervinho? Neither could I. Can you imagine Robin doing that? Yup, same here.

    I want Theo to stop talking and work on the position he is given. Understand his position and improve it as well as his technique.
  • @ask4uche247  - #cosign
    avatar
    Uhm...i totali agree wit ur analysis of d situation and also agree dat although v.persie is more reliable in front of goal due 2 age nd vast xperienc, walcott remains arsenal's most accurate hitman on 1 on 1s. I think J.Y Park also comes into contention but we r yet to see him perform...nyways if Wenger maximises d vast attackin potentials at his disposal, i see an arsenal team dat wil continuali bang in goals...doe i cnt beat my chest nd vouch 4 d defence just yet.......@ask4uche247
  • NKC
    avatar
    I feel dat wenger shld go back 2 using 4-4-2 formation. I believe with this formation we have adequate players for each dept of d team. 4 defenders 2 obliterate any attack, a DM who can beak a counter attck b4 it reaches d defenders, wide midfielders or wingers who can take up any counterattack and supply d forwards and 2 forwds dat provide us wit d goals we desperately need. As 4 walcott, always a fan, but I advice dat he shld utilize his strengths and improve on his weakness and play wit all his heart nd might, sooner or later he will gt his chance @ a foward position and also set an example for d yung ones like ryo and chamberlain and nt banter with them on the field like he did with jenkinson. Walcott has wat it takes 2 become anoda thierry henry; GUNNER 4 LIFE.
  • Petercwelch22
    avatar
    Very interesting article for all the "Theo as a striker" clan. Of which I 'was' a member.
  • Man United Killa
    avatar
    Playing a player out of position can certainly make them look bad..Theo is fast but that does not make him a candidate for a winger as his decision making is suspect..Theo is wasted out on the flanks..he is certainly not a winger ...he has already banged a few in from playing through the middle
    Just like you I like Theo but to say he is the best finisher at the club is criminal ..
    Maybe If we keep playing him through the middle,he will improve his goal scoring techniques and hopefully make his way into that bracket .
  • Kevin
    avatar
    Walcott is great but not like rvp wenger has instead when playing gervinho, van persie and walcott the switch positions and walcott or gervinho comes in the middle with rvp on the left and gervhino on the right it worked against undinese which is the only game all three played together andit will be like that when gervinho comes back and neither gets injured i predict a 20 goals for rvp 20 for walcott and around 15-18 for gervinho. the problem with this tactic is it only works with players who are strikers in mind not with arshavin who is lazy and a midfielder and hats why the attack looks so poor with him we have to adopot a new tactic and it doesnt work last season with theo van nasrigas was because nasri is selfish and wants goals while fabregas sets them up but this season arshavin is not selfish but lazy, rosicky cant createby himself so we are terible like the newcastle game
  • Francis Govia  - Theo Walcott
    avatar
    Theo's deployment centrally would force others to defend against his speed. Note Van Persie "free role" for Holland where he plays behind Klaas Jan Huntelaar. I'm surprised Arsene has taken so long to exploit both Theo's natural abilities to run past defenders and Van Persie's ease at being a distributor of the ball and striker. See, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2033313/Arsenals- Robin-van-Persie-hails-best-Holland.html
  • Cosmos
    avatar
    In My Opinion Theo is only excellent when we are dominating our opponents. He is an excellent player but the fact is that now we have Park Chu Young who is ready for success and can perfectly play Walcott's role. The only option is Wenger can use him as the leading striker and use Persie behind him. This will help us to efficiently exploit and use his pace. We can only bring the best out of him if he is use as a centre forward or a striker.
  • Podge
    avatar
    Everyone forgets how young Theo is, at 22 he is a pretty damn good winger who has regular end product, yes he often makes the wrong call either running to nowhere or a poor ball in but again he is 22.Year on year he has improved, he has been groomed for a role he probably isn't talented enough for but as a winger he is useful and still developing. He needs to take it on himself to get in central positions even if his detail is right winger. That maybe why he is listed as a striker,Wenger wants him to develop into the kind of player who will ignore his boss from time to time and do the unexpected.

    Walcott has incredible stamina none of the other sprinters (sorry pacy wingers) run as much as he does in a match and he has the same pace in the 90th minute as the first unlike a SWP or Lennon,Theo rarely looks tired at the end of games. He needs to use that to his advantage and cove more ground off the ball getting to the left wing or middle, he has the pace and stamina to get back where he is needed when we lose the ball.
  • Connor
    avatar
    Brilliant read and some very good points made. I agree that Walcott is one if the best finishers at the club, because simply he is. The boy was bought as a striker but unfortunately had to relocate on the pitch to just fit in.

    I also was expecting a more flexible formation this year with 2 strikers, maybe more hoping than expecting actually.

    My only worry is that if Walcott doesn't start to get played through the middle then he will leave whenever his contract runs out, causing another Nasri saga. If we were to lose him I'd be utterly disappointed as we'd have lost a talented kid who we have haven't utilised and because another team will come in for him and promise him a striker role, in which he will score bagloads. (FWIW I have a nagging feeling Liverpool will sign him if above situation takes place)

    Really hope it doesn't come to this!

Write comment

Your Details:
Comment:
:D:):(:0:shock::confused:8):lol::x:P:oops::cry::evil::twisted::roll::wink::!::?::idea::arrow: