Arsenal Vision logo Arsenal Vision

The Arsenal fans site for true Gooners

Articles

Written by Wenger Boy on Friday, 13 January 2012 10:02

 

Good day to all fans of the best club on Earth. If you are one of us you will know.

I hope that everyone is feeling as happy as they possibly can, although as this is most unlikely I will reluctantly settle for ‘chipper’, ‘top’ or any other slightly outdated expression of positive vibez dem. (ß current expression)

I have, unfortunately, been absent from the pages of this site for longer than I can remember since I started contributing, which is a shame. I would offer to make it up to you all with an extra special post stuffed full of expertise and jam packed with hilarity but since I’m pretty rusty my offering is more likely a poorly assembled jumble of letters lightly smothered in guesswork and dipped cautiously in amusement. Or sumfin.

I’ve returned to day to talk about rotation. Squad rotation is, I’m afraid, a real bugbear of mine. Since Wenger seems completely Plaster of Parised in his ways the problem will likely continue but, hey, whinging about things that won’t change is still useful, right? (Though @hazzaboy21 would disagree I’m sure.)

The current situation appears to be this: Wenger picks a first eleven and then plays them in successive games until they their limbs start falling off. The alternative is this: rotation. The benefits of this are thus:

  1. The first eleven get to rest
  2. The second string get used to playing
  3. Bingo

Rotating to rest key players is imperative, and as a result does take place, but the problem is that Wenger is reluctant to rotate that often for fear of affecting continuity. But continuity of playing staff and continuity of performance are two very different things. 

It makes no difference to the club which eleven players play in a given game as long as the result is favourable. If ‘Drooling’ Desmond, a local pisshead, was mistakenly registered as one of our 25 (in the home grown 8, obviously) no one would give so much as a single shitlet if he replaced RvP in the team so long as he kept staggering unpredictably into excellent scoring positions and knocking the ball in with his dizzy bonce.

You have to assume that part of the reason rotation doesn’t take place is that Wenger isn’t confident that the second string are good enough to do the job. But if there are players on our bench who haven’t played for so long that they had stop to ask directions to the Emirates then they’re even less likely to be at the required level when they are finally called upon. 

We saw this last season with Theo van Nasregas when we beat Chelsea after Christmas with our first eleven, drew with Wigan with an almost completely different set of players, and then demolished Birmingham with our first eleven a few days later. This set the pattern somewhat for the next portion of the season, where we excelled with our core staff, but when we were forced to play squad players later on they were far from prepared to do the job required.

The key solving to this is rotation. Rotation but also, importantly, integration.

Changing a first eleven for rest is one thing, and you can even rest all eleven players if you choose. But taking so many first choice players out is likely to weaken the team to an unnecessary level, which is a bad idea in important matches. 

Rotation with integration is therefore far more effective, and can only be achieved by resting different players at different times. But if done correctly you can end up with 15, 20, or even 25 or more players that you feel happy to play, which is a far better situation than having only 11, 12 or 13.

Our first eleven is not a single entity – despite what Wenger sometimes seems to believe – it is a collection of individuals who try to work together as a team. Whether we are on top form or on the point of collapse there will be some players playing better than others and some playing worse; some players tired and some players not.

This same radical, leftfield theory also applies to our second string. Chamakh may be off form but Yossi has looked pretty sharp whenever he’s played. And any player in the squad who shows form - first eleven or second string – should immediately be given increased playing time because form is hard to capture and needs to be harnessed whenever spotted.

In fact, call me crazy, but if a second string player is showing form and a first eleven player is not then that second string player should be playing instead. I fink I readed sumware dat dis is called com-peh-tish-un.

Rosicky, Yossi, Coquelin and AOC are four players who have looked good this term and would clearly benefit, and have benefited, from playing in the first instance, but also playing with the first eleven - if Song and Arteta are playing then perhaps play Rosicky and bring Ramsey on if needed; if RvP and Theo are starting then start Yossi and bring Gervinho on if needed.

If you do that and do it regularly then you may find that Rosicky and Ramsey walk through the Stars in their Eyes doorway as a first teamer and a replacement and emerge through the smoke and budget light display as two valued members of the same squad. And that’s a transformation that even Matthew Kelly would gasp at.

There are however some positions, unfortunately, where rotation can seem too big a risk, but even Park and Chamakh might improve if they were utilised more effectively. 

Integration is not only about starting players but also about giving them minutes with other in form players whenever reasonably possible. So why was neither brought on when we were beating Wigan 3-0? Why not rest our most played and influential player when we were comfortably ahead and give an off-form player a chance to play with the first team? 

Keeping Park and Chamakh on the bench and RvP on the pitch wasted an all too rare opportunity to let another striker play and only added to the tiredness that would ultimately affect our captain’s performances later on.

But though clever substitutions are important, the system works best when you combine rotation and integration. By regularly swapping just one or two first teamers for second string players, especially those who have shown form, we can integrate others and begin to possess a genuine squad, as opposed to a first eleven + those other guys who high five Theo when he comes off. 

This is the magic of integration and rotation, the more comprehensive benefits of which are thus:

  1. The first eleven get to rest
  2. The second string get used to playing
  3. The first eleven and second string get used to playing with each other
  4. The second string players who exhibit form are rewarded
  5. The second string players who are lacking form get to play with players who are on form, which will improve them
  6. There is genuine competition for places, which means players have to work harder to play
  7. This parity of opportunity means players are less likely to complain about game time, and those who do will be those underperforming
  8. Form is more likely to remain when changes in personnel are necessary
  9. The whole notion of first eleven and second string becomes far less relevant
  10. Genuine continuity, in the most important sense, is more likely to be achieved
  11. Bingo

Arsenal ended the summer transfer window with a rather large squad. This has admittedly been hit hard by recent injuries but equally it has been hit hard by the fact that several useful members of that squad that may as well be playing noughts and crosses on the team bus.

I’m no Wenger, and fuck it I love the guy, but I do fail to see the point of a having so many players outside of the first eleven if you’re not going to utilise them regularly, and then only when you’re forced to do so. Doing that says to me that either you’re making a mistake now, or that you made a mistake in purchasing them or keeping them at the club.

Yes we have injuries, yes Wilshere and Diaby would play, yes Chamberlain might not be quite ready, but Gods damn it we have the players that we have and we have to utilise them well.

When you look at a club like Man U, the most successful team in PL history, you see how effectively rotation and integration can be implemented. This is a team where the quality of their squad is often criticised but yet Rooney can be dropped for a few games and their top scorer in the league not even put on the bench in the CL final. Where Jonny Evans or John O’Shea are/were virtually guaranteed to play twenty-plus games a season while trophies are still captured.

Out first eleven, fit and on form, can beat anyone in the league, but we as fans of le Arse know just how rare a luxury that is. Squad players at Man U always get games and are always ready when called upon, which is partly why they always last the distance even in the face of injuries and absences.

Many would argue that Arsenal have at times had the better team in the past few seasons but unlike our sometimes rivals we rarely seem to have the legs to match. But maybe if Arsenal could become a little less of a team and bit more of a squad then we might find we were able to go that little bit further.

WB

@WengerBoy1

Fancy writing your own articles for fellow Gooners to read? Click Your Vision section.

Register with Arsenal Vision and officially join the debate

Comments (11)

  • MeanLean
    avatar
    Good read WB,

    The squad rotation is something that I have mentioned earlier and I believe it could have had an impact on the way things turned out towards the end of last season. Arsene tends to stick to the same eleven unless he is forced to change for the most part although he does occasionally rotate (Chamakh vs Olympiacos)

    I was very surprised that we did not see much in the way of rotation over Christmas especially those who have had to play almost every game. I can understand why van Persie has been played week in, week out and that is because of his insane goals to games ratio but when we have players like Rosicky and Benayoun on the bench, I do not understand why they have not been used anywhere near as often as their talent deserves.

    As you say, fielding 10 'first choice players' along with Rosicky one week wouldn't upset the balance of the team and then next week, use Yossi in place of Theo for example.

    The thing is, this has always been Arsene's way. During the season when we went unbeaten every fan can name our strongest side. The likes of Thierry Henry was always available. Hardly ever suffered from injury and that allowed the team to click and gain momentum. These days we do not have the same luck with injury and perhaps more rotation could help that but at the same time we do not know if this would have an adverse effect on the team. Constant rotation of players may have stopped or halted the momentum on the side when we needed to claw back points.

    I am also sure we would have seen plenty more in the way of rotation had Wilshere, Diaby, Gibbs and Santos all been fit. Those are players he obviously trusts and that may well be the reason why we have failed to see further rotation.

    Not actually sure if I am making much sense here so I will quit. But you get ma point. Maybe?
  • gooner4
    avatar
    Well written.

    Its just that simple yet extremely difficult art of balancing the squad whilst still been a threat and competitve without losing the quality and experience needed to win the games.

    There is no perfect formula but just hope le prof gets it right more times than he gets it wrong.
  • Podge
    avatar
    Agreed but you can see why Wenger hasn't rotated much this season. The incredible injury list in defence has meant we have had to rotate a player or 2 every game anyway.Continuity is key for a passing team like Arsenal and lets face it we are normally in must win games every week. If Sagna Koscielney Vermalen Gibbs were all fit and formed a stable back line with Szcesney behind them then it would be easy to rotate the rest of the team without effecting the performance that much.

    A set back line is so important and not just for defence nearly all our attacks start from the back and our full backs join in most of them.Wenger has said AOC wold have got more games had Sagna been fit(tear). Santos was such an attacking threat for us that we could rest a forward and not worry about the attack being weakened if he was fit.
  • Steve
    avatar
    I always think its also unfair on the squad players when wholesale changes are made. For example I bet Park/Chamakh would fair better with theo and Gerv on the wings and Ramsey arteta and song behind them.
  • Wenger Boy
    avatar
    My thoughts exactly. They'd feed off the talent/form of others.
  • Wenger Boy
    avatar
    Making perfect sense ML. And I agree that rotation would have been more likely with those players available, but seeing as they are not I just think we could have utilised it more than we have.

    TR7 and Yossi in particular have looked good this season, and Arteta, Ramsey, Gervinho and Walcott have played loads, sometimes to their detriment. Must be a compromise in there somewhere.
  • Wenger Boy
    avatar
    Fingers crossed. We're not failing on that front, but dropped points at Fulham (home and away) and Wolves may well have been saved by a slightly smarter policy.
  • Wenger Boy
    avatar
    I agree with all of that, and changes elsewhere have probably limited Wenger's bravery in that respect, but there have been games when we've looked shattered and a tired player of real quality is not as much use as a fresh player of slightly less quality. You can always bring the better player on later if necessary.

    That said I do take your point and I'm sure if we hadn't had the injury worries we have we may well have seen it more.
  • jedai gunner  - Wow
    avatar
    This is the most detailed article I have read on any arsenal blog . Its a shame I am just discovering this site, I feel forced to read older articles. Keep up the good job.
  • Wenger Boy
    avatar
    Thank you kindly.
  • capy ton  - great skills player
    avatar
    hey guys, checkout this player he's just crowned as the best Arabian football player for 2011 :wink:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZESYjZIZ2Ds

Write comment

Your Details:
Comment:
:D:):(:0:shock::confused:8):lol::x:P:oops::cry::evil::twisted::roll::wink::!::?::idea::arrow: