Arsenal Vision logo Arsenal Vision

The Arsenal fans site for true Gooners

Reviews

Written by Mean Lean on Monday, 04 October 2010 14:29

I wish I could be woken up from what feels like another bad dream, a nightmare that I and many Gooners around the world have had to experience in the past. Without wanting to state the obvious, winning football games is about scoring more goals than your opposition, all the bits in the middle can be seen as irrelevant at the final whistle.

We went to Stamford Bridge with only one point in two games against mid to lower teams, we also had a pile of important players in the treatment room, yet we produced a top class performance. As usual we out played Chelsea,  passed around their chasing shadows but when it came to the final third we did not have quite enough quality to unlock their tough regimented defence.

I spoke about the need for Arsenal to be efficient on the day, we needed to take the chances that came to us because we would not be given a great deal. We should have scored in the very first minute of the game when Sagna whipped in a cross from the right and Chamakh got ahead of Alex at the front post, his diving header flicked off the defender and away for a corner. A great early chance to take the lead but we were not done yet. The resulting corner was flicked on by Squillaci at the near post, looping over to Koscielny who ghosted in to head over the bar from a few yards out. He just needed to take the sting off of the ball and guide it into the net, instead he put his momentum into the ball and that was just too much.

I had my hands on my head for the next five minutes. Why couldn't we for once, take the very first chance that was presented to us and change the direction of the game. Our game plan could have been altered, we wouldn't then have the need to go pushing forward in search of a goal, instead using the ball to attract the Chelsea players towards us and then hit then quickly when they were out of position. Instead we failed to convert and we let Chelsea off the hook. I tried to get that feeling out of my head but it was grating on me all during the first half.

I was surprised to see Abou Diaby start the game after being out injured and I was even more surprised to see him playing further forward. Abou who was shockingly bad at West Brom the week before had a superb game. We missed his presence in our games against them last season and they found it difficult to deal with his quick feet and dribbling. Ability is certainly not an issue with Diaby, consistency is still what he should be striving for.

Arshavin had a cracking shot from distance that was well saved by Cech but I thought Nasri should have done better when he brilliantly sold Ramires on the edge of the area and cut inside on his left foot, instead of curling an effort towards the far post he struck through the ball and his shot flew wide of the post. How I wish Nasri had swapped one of his goals against West Brom for that strike to have found the bottom corner of Cech's net.

Clearly we were the better team, and looked the more likely team to break through but when you are playing a top side at their own ground then they will always remain a threat. Didier Drogba had been well marshaled until just before half time. He had a shot well saved by Fabianski earlier in the half. Five minutes before half time Drogba scored against Arsenal yet again. Ramires had fouled Song moments earlier but nothing was given, Chelsea moved the play on to Drogba who got fouled himself. A quick free kick was taken and Ashley Cole who was fed by Ramires, eventually crossed to Drogba on the near post to turn it into the net on the turn.

There was a catalogue of wrongs that could have prevented the goal. Song's first touch let him down after Jack flicked the ball to him, Squillaci wasn't switched on after bringing down Drogba, Chamakh was not aggressive enough in the tackle with Ramires, he was favourite to win the ball but didn't commit himself as much as the Brazilian did. Sagna was not tight enough on Cole and Koscielny could have blocked Drogba's near post flick. Plenty of if's and maybe's to deal with. Some more guilty than others but it was the same result. We were not able to keep them out.

We should have been winning the game but instead found ourselves behind at the break.

A few minutes later we had another chance to score, Chamakh attempting to pull down an Arshavin cross when going for goal in a great position would have been the better choice.

It looked as if Abou Diaby's afternoon and quite possibly much more was over when Essien landed on his ankle. Fortunately he was able to continue. The second half was much like the first, Arsenal dominating the ball, looking for gaps in the Chelsea defence and once those gaps were found, continuing not to take advantage.

Samir Nasri whipped in a great ball from the right across the six yard box, all that was needed was for Andrey Arshavin to be standing at the back post to tap it into the unguarded net but Arshavin did not attack that space.

Chelsea could have sealed the match on the hour, captain for the day Squillaci messed up his lines and fell over while attempting a back pass, Anelka was on it in a flash, he rounded the impressive Fabianski and only managed to hit the side netting. It is a chance missed like that at 1-0 up that Arsenal would often be punished for, I hoped that it could become a major talking point at the end of the game and not an insignificance.

I thought Rosicky added plenty of purpose when he replaced Diaby with twenty minutes to go, I thought he might have started the game but it is hard to argue the inclusion of Abou Diaby who was one of our better players both offensively and defensively. Diaby won many headers from Chelsea corners when he was on the pitch and he was a constant thorn in the Chelsea side. Rosicky added something different, something sharper. If Arsenal would have scored then I would have put money on little Mozart having a part to play in it.

Chamakh had missed another header from yet another Sagna cross, Chamakh usually so deadly in the air could not find that goal when we so badly needed it and that was a shame. His graft and work up front was commendable. He must have run more than any forward in the league during that 90 minutes.

Jay Emmanuel-Thomas made his first Premier League appearance, coming off the bench to replace Wilshere who had a very good game against experienced players.

Three minutes later Chelsea wrapped up the points. Nasri made a sloppy pass that Anelka intercepted, Koscielny had no choice but to bring him down and take the yellow card. Drogba was set to take the kick but then moved to the side of the ball. Alex who has had his fair share of success against us in the past, drove an unstoppable rocket shot into the top corner of Fabianski's net. The accuracy of the strike was even more impressive when you think that Malouda was occupying the exact spot that Alex struck at. The Arsenal wall should have been wiser to it as they couldn't have expected that Malouda was there to attempt to block his team mates effort.

Essien could have made it three shortly afterwards but Fabianski once again did well to block the effort. The final whistle blew and Chelsea celebrated. Another professional performance by Chelsea and another good display from the Arsenal without the final touches.

Conclusion

It was much of the same, Arsenal played the football, looked the more convincing team, failed to take chances and were punished. It was an improved display from the Arsenal team, even if we were missing some of our most important players. As much as the injuries frustrate me, we had a team out there good enough to beat a Chelsea first team minus Frank Lampard and that in itself is a positive. Having been shown the Chelsea bench before the game I cannot say that I am too impressed with their squad. Profligate or not, Chelsea would not have had a chance against us with Drogba (Van Persie), Lampard (Cesc), Terry (Vermaelen) and Malouda (Walcott) missing and we had those players minus Cesc available.

The one thing that I will say is that blaming our missed chances on injuries is a little too simplistic. I believe that Wenger has created a team full of great creative footballers who can score goals yet we do not always have great goal scorers who can play football. In games where the opposition are strong defensively and committed to breaking against us then we often find it difficult to take the little chances we do have.

Over the course of the season we will score plenty of goals because our creative players churn out plenty of chances but in games like that, we missed an Eduardo of old who had the sense of where to be in the box and once he was presented with one of the new chances he would have the calmness and confidence to find a corner instead of snatching at shots or looking for another player.

Carlos Vela will be that player but he isn't ready to dominate Chelsea just yet.

This is a very disappointing result but losing away to the Champions is no reason to commit suicide. A seven point gap at the beginning of October is nothing to speak of, not ideal but simply far too early to be talking of waving white flags.

On a brighter note, if these players can put in that effort and performance in most weeks then we will win enough games to be right up there at the end of the season. It depends on the players and no one else. Arsenal vs West Brom and Chelsea vs Arsenal were two different games by the same group of players. Whichever group decide to turn up more often will decide our season when the trophies are handed out in May.

Fabianski (7)
Sagna (7)
Squillaci (6.5)
Koscielny (7)
Clichy (7.5)
Song (6.5)
Wilshere (7)
Diaby (7.5)
Nasri (7)
Chamakh (7)
Arshavin (6.5)

Please note that ratings are only my interpretations of the game and that others will have differing opinions

Fancy writing your own articles for fellow Gooners to read? Click Your Vision section.

Register with Arsenal Vision and officially join the debate

Comments (13)

  • ManUnited Killa  - Truth Hurts :-(
    avatar
    Well done to a few players on the team.Fabianski came away with a solid performance.Nice one there...anyways...
    Mean Lean,we are all well-meaning Gunners,I assure you.I read your pre-match blog but honestly did you really believe that we would beat Chelsea?with this average squad?..am sorry but you don't win leagues with a squad like this. Quality,Mentality and Style of play is killing us.
    as usual we outplayed Chelsea??passing around?much more like making unnecessary passes.Our style of play is starting to become negative especially when someone has to shoot and attempts to pass the ball thus allowing the opponent to cover.Does anyone have any idea how many chances we miss doing that?
    We were not the better team.what does the better team mean?We always have the possession against most opponents.Yet we pass the ball even when unnecessary.
    Talking about crossing the ball from fullbacks,how many times has sagna or clicy come really close to the 18 yard box to cross the ball.they almost always do it at the by line.which means the ball ends up in the air,thus limiting the number of attacking Arsenal players who can fight for the ball(well unless you are good in the air).which is a quality we dont have.
    As for the excuses about injuries,i'm afraid it is no more valid.Arsenal makes too many excuses.If we knew we had that problem we should have solved it with quality backup.period.chelsea didnt have Lamps and Essien for long stretches of the season.and even Drogba.
    Until we sign some real World class players,players who can single-handedly change games..like Tevez does for Citeh,like VDV is doing for Spurs,like Gourcuff does for Bordeaux,we wont even win a plastic cup.
    ...talk about having Champagne dreams on a beer budget...aint gonna happen.We need to sign and change our style of play a little and we need to do it now!
  • alf15  - We will never beat them with Drogba playing
    avatar
    Good post mean lean,

    But untill Drogba retires or goes to another team we will never beat them! Fabianski was my man of the match, saved our asses alot yesterday. Fair play to him!

    Your point on Vela being the player to be our new fox in the box in the furture...dont agree with that all. Vela is useless! All he does it fall over and dive! He is by far the worst player at the club. He should be sent packing back to the spanish league where he can showboat and dive because he cant handle the premierleague. Would love to be proved wrong about him, but from what i have seen from him the past 2 seasons, he just dnt have it.
  • angelic beardy
    avatar
    I disagree with Manunited killa, i think we had a decent game and were unlucky not to get something out of the game. Yes Chelsea still have that killer edge over us but lets not forget they are champions and a v good team. It was a game i'm afraid where we needed a bit of a cutting edge i.e Fabregas and V Persie. I agree with Mean Lean that we lack an out and out goalscorer who will get anything on the ball to score as there was some decent whipped in crosses but not one Arsenal player trying to anti****te it. You mention VDV for the spuds as a world class player, i agree he is good but come on it was only Villa that he beat not a Manu or Chelsea lets save these world class comments till the end of the season. Remember a certain Fabragas destroying Villa last season at home.
  • Bala
    avatar
    I too was disappointed with the result but not the perfomance.I think Arshavin was really lazy and poor.Squillaci really struggled with drogba and Song & Chamakh were not at their best.More importantly onto the positives Jack was outstanding,Nasri continues to impress,Clichy was back to his best and finally we hace a goalkeeper who is really confident.I hope Fabianski does a Eboue and Song in repaying Arsene's faith in him.
  • Bala
    avatar
    Arsene was spot on when he said we lacked sharpness in the final third.As I said earlier Chamakh is yet to score an away goal in the league and I am disappointed with it.
    We very much miss RVP as he is not only a great finisher,he is my favourite Arsenal player too(I miss him so much)
  • MeanLean
    avatar
    MUK,

    As you may expect I disagree with you totally. To keep it simple all you need to do is look at the stats. Arsenal had 8 shots off target Chelsea had 5, Arsenal had 5 on target and Chelsea had 6.

    No matter how you want to look at the game, we had chances to score goals and so did they. To say that we had no chance is just plain wrong.

    If we scored in the first minute like we should have done then would we still have NO chance to win the game? If Drogba's flick got stuck in between his legs and cleared away and then Chamakh's header went in would we still have no chance?

    The facts are we should have scored goals and we never, they missed some but they took the one goal that mattered just before half time.

    I don't know why not having your best players on the pitch is making excuses. It is a fact. It doesn't matter how many times it is said, it is still a fact.

    If Chelsea had lost without Drogba, Lampard, Terry, Cole and Essien then I bet you would say that we only won because they didn't have their best players.

    You cannot build a squad with three players at the same quality of Cesc just in case he gets injured. We have a fantastic squad who are improving all the time, but they are not as good as Cesc and Van Persie, that is only normal.

    If Rooney gets injured then Sir red nose cannot pull out a spare Rooney from his back pocket.

    Well done Chelsea, they did what they had to do and they did it well. But to say that we had no chance of winning a game that was clear could have gone either way is just.. as I said. Plain wrong.
  • Goonerfish
    avatar
    Good overview ML, We were two finishes away from taking the points home yesterday. Kos could've settled us right at the start and like you said Nasri in the 2nd half.
    I said Diaby would start yesterday but only because I thought he'd be a 2nd DM with Song allowing Wilshere to run riot.

    Finishing was the difference yesterday, They proved they can do it after not having the ball for long spells and we showed that we struggle even when we have most of the play.
    We played the better football but Chelsea were far more efficient with the possesion they had.

    Wow, MUKilla, that's alot of negativity. An average squad? who else can go into an away game at the Champions whilst missing the spine of their team and still produce a performance like that? I agree we still lack 'something' but I honestly believe we have one of the strongest squads in the league. I can't think of anyone else that would cope with losing their 1st choice keeper, best CB, best world class CM AND their top striker. Can you?

    This is only 1 point lost as everyone would have been happy with a draw yesterday, we just need to make sure we take all three when they come to the Emirates.
  • James McKean
    avatar
    Arsenal 'won' the midfield battle, as they did last year at Stamford Bridge. But I think the key weakness of this Arsenal side (and this is highlighted when playing against this Chelsea) is that Arsenal's counter attack is not good enough.

    Chelsea soak up pressure, and then break quickly. Seeing Malouda, Drogba and Anelka (who was generally poor yesterday) bearing down on goal with such speed is frightening almost every time they break.

    Its so much easier for a team to defend (and harder for the opponent to attack) when you've got a strong counter up your sleeve.

    I bet that Ashley Cole's average touch position was considerably closer to his own goal than Clichy's, but he far was more dangerous going forward.

    In short this Chelsea are very good, while Arsenal are very good in midfield, but merely good in attack and defence.
  • CHGooner
    avatar
    ML,

    This was a big improvement, we weren't hammered. Had we taken chances we MIGHT have got something from the game but the sad truth is that Arsenal are a one-dimensional team and the personnel on the pitch may change the quality of our game but not it's nature. Chelsea and Man U know how to beat us and do it with predictable regularity. 2/18 wins against Chelsea and 4/15 against Man U since 04 tells its own story.

    Wenger never thinks to vary tactics or personnel to surprise or counteract an opponent. When was the last time we did something that surprised you? I think Stoke away last season maybe, but that was such a rarity it remains worthy of comment.

    I think Chelsea KNEW they could win that game without playing very well, whereas even if we played at our very best we would have been 50/50 at best.

    That is the truth and it isn't going to change while the current Finance Director - sorry Manager - is in charge.


  • A Gooner among others  - Great post Mean Lean
    avatar
    I have difficulties explaining the fact that we haven't won a big match for two years.

    I have been thinking a lot about it.
    I don't think the 4-3-3 formation makes us weaker : we beat ManU at the Emirates in a brilliant game with that formation.
    I don't think it is down to the quality of the players : worse teams than us have beaten Chelsea and ManU in the last two years.
    I don't think it is down to injuries, our squad is huge and has real quality.

    Maybe we have underestimated the importance of having a superstriker, you know, someone who can run with the ball, has superb thechnique and moves well.
    RVP is an awesome but he doesn't bring us what Henry or Wright brought us and he doesn't bring the same things as Adebayor.

    Overall we had a good game. It had nothing to do with last year's game. Last year we had only one chance ! This time we were more dangerous. Had Cesc or RVP been there ... (sigh).

    7 seven points behind. Now let's have a good rest and prepare for what will be (I am sure of it) 8 epic months.

  • Sergio Giorgini  - So close to plaudits...
    avatar
    I saw more positives in the game than some do. For a start I thought, miscued punch aside, Fabianski has proved that at the least he has the ability to work under the pressure of a big game. Two games does not make him a success and I still haven't forgotten that recently he should of kept out Keane's Carling Cup goal, but their was an agreeable air of confidence that I've not seen in him in a while. To have that in a game against THE team to beat right now, is not something to sniff at. His body language on all his saves looked strong and assured with none of the hesitancy and flapping we've seen in the past from him and Al and in my view, forced Anelka out wide for his shot into the netting even after (depending on how charitable you feel) slipping or nearly going to ground too early. As much as I don't rule out a 'Flappyhandski Special' in the next game, I can still see the seeds of an 'Eboue'. Not ideal for the now as we fans do deserve a solid goalkeeper after all we've had to put up with, but who knows for the future.

    The defence wasn't as bad as it's been in the past against Chelsea and considering the two central defenders are still in the early part of their first season, one of whom is still carrying the naivety of youth and the other someone people wrote off as being a 31 year-old journeyman, they looked a lot less troubled by Chelsea than previous pairings. Their mistakes on the day were obvious, were why we lost the match and have been well covered elsewhere, but I still thought they looked more with it than we have previously. For both goals you should point fingers at the defending by the more attacking minded players.

    The other big myth I'm hearing is that Chelsea 'allowed' us to play and caught us on the break. This completely ignores that in the first half Chelsea came out the traps and it was actually our harrying of them that forced them to switch to a more defensive game even before the first goal. In fact, none of the goals came from catching us on the break. Both were from free kicks, none of which were from a break as such. Not saying we weren't caught on the break, just trying to shoot down those who seem to be reaching for easy comments that whilst true in the past, weren't on Sunday.

    As for being out-muscled and how it was 'men against boys', that's an insult to how well Diaby and Wilshere caused problems for their midfield. At no point did I feel we were bullied at all.

    For me the difference between us and Chelsea is our lack of clinical finishers and our lack of players who just shoot in the 18 yard box. The benefit of clinical finishers is obvious, but I think there's a big psychological edge we can glean from the latter. Not only will players get used to shooting in the 18 yard box, but when you're a 'keeper or defender having to deal with players who shoot (no matter how wildly) as well as pass, it'll raise the spectre of uncertainty. This is something Wenger should be held accountable for, as clearly something has to done on the training pitch.

    Don't get me wrong I know this is a positive post and I could pick out plenty of negatives, but when so many others are at the point of seeing ghosts in shadows I'd rather try and see what we did well. Whilst we clearly didn't do enough to win the game on Sunday, I think we did enough to build on for the game at the Grove.
  • Anonymous
    avatar
    Sky Sports have apologised to all their subscribers.As a result of a fault at Sky headquarters instead of showing the Chelsea v Arsenal game live a tape of last seasons game was played by mistake.Surprisingly Sky say they had no complaints as no one noticed the difference :roll: :wink: :shock: :D 8)
  • Sir Henry  - Little Has Changed
    avatar
    The “clinical striker” thing is a bit of a red herring. With all our possession and sideways passing in front of their 18 yard box it allows teams (not just Chelsea) to fill the box and reduce the available space to the extent that it suffocates the attack. That’s why it’s so necessary to keep up the pace so that the opposition cannot re-group and “park the bus”. Against the likes of Chelsea who have quality all over the pitch, I think they are happy to concede possession to us, one because they can’t get the ball, but secondly they know that once the play is condensed in and around their penalty area they can keep us out and wait to hit us on the break. And here’s the real rub. Our defence is our glass jaw. I’m not talking about the quality of our defenders per se (goalkeeping aside); I’m talking about the team ethos, the attitude and approach. Arsenal are set up to attack and to try to outscore the opposition and this makes defending a secondary issue. It is, after all, very difficult and incredibly hard work to sprint back and cover when an attack breaks down and your focus has been on occupying the opposition half for long periods. More and more teams are doing this against us and those with the quality of Man Utd and Chelsea have little trouble in seeing us off. Any successful team needs to be built from the back and Arsene seems to be struggling with this concept.

Write comment

Your Details:
Comment:
:D:):(:0:shock::confused:8):lol::x:P:oops::cry::evil::twisted::roll::wink::!::?::idea::arrow: