Reviews
Written by Mean Lean on Thursday, 25 October 2012 19:11
I wish I had written this last night now. My body is in the middle of digesting another poor display but now I have to bring it back up to the surface. Uncomfortable and painful.
I stated in my match preview that I had a bad feeling about the game so in some ways I think it had lessened the blow at the final whistle somewhat.
Confidence is such an important factor in this sport and with the Germans coming off the back of a fantastic away win at the German champions, along with our quite pathetic display at Norwich, well only one team would step onto that pitch with a spring in their step and it wasn't going to be us.
The Emirates stadium is not a place where the Arsenal players can snuggle into a bosom for comfort, the Arsenal supporters wanted to see a reaction after the weekend so it was a case of that football, supporter catch-22 that we witness so often when a team goes through bad form.
Before I get onto our own display, I think we should all give plenty of credit to the opposition who were fantastic in every department, and perhaps should have won by more than two clear goals. They are not Aston Villa, and deserve respect. They have many top class players and were the better side on the night without question. Schalke had started the game with the aim to keep things tight, get behind the ball and not allow us to score the first goal, when they settled down, they then took the game to us.
They obviously had a game plan to play passes in behind Andre Santos and get Farfan sprinting after the ball much in the way we do with Theo Walcott. It worked. They had torn us to shreds over and over again in the first 45 minutes. I expected Santos to sit a little after the first few times but he kept coming forward, kept moving into central midfield areas and he was not being covered by his team mates.
We were lucky to go into half time with a clean sheet. Like many have said, it is amazing to think that nothing was done tactically to stop our left side of the pitch being exploited the way it was.
The team's attitude and commitment was questioned last night but I get the feeling that some are lumping last night's display with our game against Norwich. There was nothing wrong with our commitment last night, we just simply played very poorly. Especially offensively. Our attack has become a real issue and for an Arsene Wenger team that must be a concern.
Gervinho has lost his early season sharpness, Podolski has been stuck on the wing deep in his own half at times. While Aaron Ramsey on the right gave us very little on the night. We look very disjointed going forward and it doesn't help when the personnel in attack are being rotated on almost a weekly basis.
The two Dutchmen scored the goals for the Germans, mistakes were made as ever when goals are conceded. It is the nature of the beast. I do not need to explain how they came about. It is too late in the day for that now.
Beyond the goalkeeper, tactics, personnel and what have you, what is most worrying is our bluntness in attack. It is very concerning that we have not been able to create chances for two matches in a row.
It must be worrying Arsene because for any of his faults, building creative goal scoring teams has certainly not been one of them. We look completely devoid of ideas. We are having possession and doing very little with it. Very little interchanging, very few quick combinations and the movement from the front players is almost nonexistent.
The question Arsene needs to find the answer to, is why has the International break disrupted us so badly? The Chelsea defeat aside, we had been doing very well. Even against Chelsea we had enough chances to have won that match but since all the players have come back to Arsenal from their travels, they look like they have never set eyes on each other before, let alone understand each other's play.
This has been the problem with Arsene's football for a while. When finely tuned, it is one of the best in the world to watch and also hugely effective but when something goes slightly wrong, we break down. Then it takes plenty of twiddling and adjusting to get us back to where we need to be to win games.
I would love to look back at the data and write some analysis on this subject but I am guessing that our results depend on our form more than most teams. I guess it is difficult to measure teams out of form though so researching could be tricky.
You do not need to be in a rich vein of form to defend as a unit defensively and then cross well and attack the ball. Manchester United have done this many times and showed this recently against Raga after going two goals down. But to play a pass and move game, relying on confidence in your technique requires a high level of belief and consistency in your game. Injuries, tiredness or a drop of confidence can put a stop to that and my guess is that we are seeing just that at the moment. A wire has been cut in our system and the whole team has shut down.
I have no question that we will improve as a team. I mean, we have a list of players to come back into the team of quality but I refuse to use injuries as an excuse because we have players on that pitch at Norwich and yesterday against Schalke that are good enough to create chances, keep clean sheets and win games.
It is just a worry how fragile our position is regardless of how well we are playing. We need to find an automatic gear that will still win games. Perhaps that most fabled story of the wonderful plan b.
I am tempted to once again talk about Arsene Wenger's management style but it seems like something I do every season when we go through a bad run of fixtures so I am staying clear of that for now for the most part. His strengths keep us in the Champions League every season even though we have sold so many top players but his weaknesses do not seem to be addressed. A vicious footballing circle but perhaps that is something for another time.
I do want to jump back to the match for a second and end with something remotely positive, because quite frankly I much rather enjoy bathing in positivity than the raging negativity that is going around right now.
Francis Coquelin was included last night, his first game for a while now and the boy done good. We have had issues of players coming in without games and not being able to produce due to lack of game time. Coquelin looked sharp, passed cleanly and as Tom Watt would say 'the boy loves a tackle'
Based on the last two matches, I would say that he deserves a place in the team ahead of Aaron Ramsey who seems to have come back from the Internationals out of sorts like most of the team.
It may well be a little unfair or too much pressure for Serge Gnabry to be given a starting spot during this period of bad form but quite frankly, he looks like our only fit attacking player who is making things happen. He has done more in his last two cameos than other senior players have done in 90 minute games.
He gave the ball away late in the game which cost us the second goal but he is purposeful, quick and the ball seems to get drawn to him. He showed some of his potential only seconds of coming on the pitch. A drag in between two players gave him room for the cross and it was one of the few times the crowd stood to their feet. He was also the only player to get a shot on target during the whole game.
I want to see Cazorla feeding passes into him, that could be the one thing that could spark this team back into life.
We are still in a good position in our group to qualify so this defeat is not the end of our season although back to back defeats feels a little like that.
We are much better than this as we showed against Manchester City and Liverpool not so long ago and that is why these results feel so bad.
Whatever the issues are post Internationals, we need to fix up and get some players back from the treatment table. Let us shut the door on what has been an awful week and get back to our best.
Fancy writing your own articles for fellow Gooners to read? Click Your Vision section.
-
25-Oct-2012 21:47 | | Isgnabrythenewoxtheo
Great piece. I thought the Germans were really good. I was especially impressed by their positional discipline and their speed when they needed to regroup and iIt highlighted the lack of a cohesive strategy in our own team. I thought we played like a team of highly talented individuals who either misunderstood or mis-intuited the movements of their colleagues. I wonder if this is the great weakness wenger has. An over reliance and faith in the individual to express themselves on the football pitch, which can work brilliantly if the team is adrenalised, confident and 100% up for the fight, but which falters at the first whiff of doubt. I'm not talking about a plan B, I'm just talking about a strategy where every one knows their job and has a clear objective during the game.
-
25-Oct-2012 22:21 | | TheNoider - The 12th man
Hello there, this is the first time that I am actually posting a comment here, I am a fellow Gunner fan the last 8 years(i am now 20), since I started watching football as a kid, as many here I am quite frustrated with the defeat from Shalke and the most worrying thing is seeing our players lacking motivation for the win. Yes sure tactical mistakes were made,we didnt defend too much,our attack was the worst since I dont remember when, but the most miserable thing of all is, us as fans. We are one of the biggest teams in England, how can we actually letting teams from around Europe come in to our stadium and make their presence felt more than us. They were like 3.000 fans of Shalke and they were up and down all night. What about us? Where was our support to our own team?? Where was our voice?? If I was Vermaelen(the captain of our team) I would be very gutted seeing our fans not supporting the team no matter how bad we play.
-
25-Oct-2012 22:43 | | Fatso
TheNoider, not a bad comment for a start
"I would be very gutted seeing our fans not supporting the team no matter how bad we play"
The fans pay to watch "top class" football
"Arsenal have the most expensive adult matchday ticket at £126 and season ticket at £1,955, while Scottish Football League Division Three side Montrose's are the cheapest at £9 and £90 respectively. The cheapest season ticket available to watch the Gunners still costs more than the most expensive season tickets on offer at all but three of their Premier League rivals."
-
25-Oct-2012 22:51 | | David - Rounding on fans of Santos
"Not being covered by his teammates"...come on ML, even the most one-eyed Santos fan must finally admit he is out of his depth trying to defend. The other players had their own specific duties to fulfil; who can blame Arteta for having had enough of 'covering' for the fat inept buffon as he did las season! I can't fathem why felow Gooners actually like this clown!!! He was panting like a dog after only 12 minutes...he is an utter waste of space and was the primary reason for the defeat as his presence unsettles and eventually unbalances the whole defene and team. He makes Traore seem like a decent left-back in comparison!
-
25-Oct-2012 22:55 | | David
Just to follow on, great article as ever and good to see that most blogs have given due credit to Schalke. It is a shame most of the time we can't congratuate teams when they deservedly beat us in the league in a similar manner to last night.
-
25-Oct-2012 23:55 | | TheNoider
@Fatso
I totally agree with you on that, but if you want yourself to be considered as one of the elites in Europe you ought to make the opposition have a hard time when they come at your place. Spend about 5 minutes to observe the fans of Olympiacos that we will actually play them in their court. Its like a hell in there! Last year Mannone almost pissed himself being behind those fans. I dont agree at all with football violence of course but no matter what price the ticket is you owe it to yourself to be a bit more energetic. Whenever I hear people saying that we are like a librrary in there I feel awful.
-
26-Oct-2012 04:15 | | Spectrum
The Noider - Our supporters have long been quieter than most, which is disappointing. I've no doubt that they'd like to "get behind the team" more as many urge on here. We'd all agree with that.
However, when as a supporter, you "sing your heart out for the lads", and the players produce insipid, passionless displays such as we have witnessed all too frequently, it must get demoralising and frustrating. Even more so after it becomes a regular occurence, and over a number of seasons. We put our faith in the team, encourage them, and they don't deliver. Worse still, they often don't seem to CARE. Then we get further insulted when the fifth richest club in Europe ( us ) increase season ticket prices further, despite ALREADY having the most expensive matchdays in the Premiership. No wonder there were chants of "6% you're having a laugh" ringing out around the Emirates. Then there have been / will be, the boos and jeers that result from nothing concrete being done about it. Not hard to empathise with them.
If I was able to attend ( and afford ) the matches, I'd be doing the same. It's our right to do so. We pay to be entertained, and expect to receive VALUE FOR OUR MONEY by the team giving 100% from the kick off. Otherwise we're being taken for granted by both the team and the management / board. And that disturbingly, is what has happened, and is STILL happening. The unaddressed question is how long should we keep tolerating it ?
( According to Golum ( paspartu ), there's no rush. We've got 125 years in which to get it right. Shows what a tool he is ).
"IAWR"
-
26-Oct-2012 08:06 | | Waterboy
Keep the faith ML! I honestly believe Arsenal need to adjust only a couple of minor but significant details in attack and the team will be up and running again.
The consistency in which our players play in a particular position is one of the issues I believe leading to some of our disjointed performances. For example, if Gervinho is to be a CF, that position and that position alone is where he should be played when he is played. He should not IMO also be considered to play in the LCAM or RCAM roles. Similarly if Ramsey is to be a RCAM, that position and that position alone is where he should be played when he is played. He should not in in my opinion also be considered to play in either of the two deeper CM roles, LCAM role or CAM role. I think if players are played consistently in only a single position in the team, the player should develop a greater awareness and understanding of the specific requirement of that role, and theoretically that should lead to the player executing the obligations of that particular role more effectively and improve their overall contribution to the team.
Also an apparant lack of understanding in the team as to how the players are expected to create goal scoring opportunities appears to be stifling the teams attack. Obviously if the team was to focus on one way and one way only to score (e.g. Cazorla passing to Giroud) every match, our opponents should theoretically be able to nullify that threat quite easily. However I think it would be more effective if the team defined to some degree how it intended to create goal scoring opportunities but which also provides for a degree of diversity (e.g. Predominately pass the ball laterally across the field around the 18 yard box with the LB and RB advanced and creating the width, the LCAM, CAM and RCAM midfielders operating quite centrally just outside the 18 yard box, and the CF positioning himself relatively centrally in the opposition's 18 yard box and those players using give and goes to make advances inside the 18 yard box and striking on goal or to create shooting opportunities outside of the 18 yard box and similarly making an attempt on goal. ATM there doesnt appear to be any clear understanding between the players about how to create goal scoring opportunities aside from working the ball wide to the advancing fullbacks to cross to our one central striker to make an attempt on goal, which doesn't seem to be working or suit our formation.
-
26-Oct-2012 08:18 | | 'desi'gner gooner - Wrote this comment yesterday....got lost in the ve
Hi ML and other gooners.....
Re-posting what I thought about the Schalke game and our frailties in general...
Here goes,,,,
Reading some of the reaction makes me feel as if we are relegated or something!!! Of course it is disappointing to lose two on the trot but this is the same squad that all of us were gushing about after the upton park victory....Fickleness of such magnitude is not healthy to say the least. The international break and the subsequent injuries have obviously played their part. Yes there is that obvious argument that other teams had the international break as well and that injuries are part and parcel of the modern game but then the truth also is that a lot of the top teams including the likes of Barcelona & Real Madrid had struggled in the past week. Chelsea were outplayed by a brilliant Shakhtar side and United found themselves trailing by two before they recovered. So the malaise has affected a lot of the top teams and not just ourselves. Yes the lack of chances created is worrisome but I also was reminded of the first two games of the season where we were lacked any sort of penetration - and it was only the defense which got us the solitary points from each of those games.
About the game itself - I think the player we missed the most was Kieran Gibbs and I mean in an offensive manner and not a defensive one. Podolski has been invisible in the past couple of matches and the situation is eerily similar to that of Walcott who went missing last season before his favorite pairing with Sagna was restored in the line up. Poldi and Gibbs have had wonderful combination play down the left touchline and have often fed each other some really super balls in behind the opposition defense. Santos has an inclination to drift inside when going forward and thereby Poldi has been insignificant. It is glaringly obvious that our attack has a strong left side bias this season with Poldi playing there and lack of a proper winger on the right flank.
IMO we need to get Gibbs fit and back in the starting eleven pronto and if we are to be a more balanced side - we either need to restore the Sagna-Walcott axis along the right flank to go with the Poldi-Gibbs axis on the left or else if Theo doesn't sign the damn thing then buy a proper right winger so that Sagna or Corporal Jenkinson can combine with that fella...Or the third option would be to have a fully fit Rosicky playing in the Cazorla role and have Cazorla play the right flank attacking role. We are easy to defend against because of our left sided bias vis-a-vis our lack of variety in movement and passing because of the same
-
26-Oct-2012 11:25 | | Waterboy
Hi Designer Gooner! I really like your post and agree with a lot of your comments. Am interested to hear your thoughts on how you think Arsenal have gone about creating goal scoring chances this seasons and if you think Arsenal's attack has demonstrated a consistent approach to creating chances or if you perceive their attacking play thus far to focus on continually passing the ball in an effort to move the opposition around and hopeful create space for goal scoring opportunities?
-
26-Oct-2012 12:41 | | Spectrum - We should win, but....
Whilst in theory, we should be a rolled gold certainty to beat Queens Park Rangers, a few stats should be of concern ; ( from Sporting intelligence.com ).....
( quote ) " And now they ( Arsenal ) face two Premier League matches versus the two current top-flight clubs against whom, historically, they have the worst Premier League records ".
"QPR are first, this weekend, at The Emirates, followed by Manchester United, at Old Trafford, on 3 November ".
"Arsenal have won an average of 1.1 points per game against both QPR and United – from 10 and 40 Premier League games respectively. In their 10 Premier League games with QPR, Arsenal have won two, drawn five and lost three, winning just 11 points from a possible 30 ".
"In 40 games with United they have won 44 points from a possible 120, also at a ratio of 1.1 per game." ( end quote ).
So we're about to play two teams we historically struggle against. Not encouraging reading is it ?
"But ", you say, "surely we should be able to beat a team that's languishing at the bottom of the table shouldn't we " ? Well that's what we said about Norwich, who had / has, the second worst defence in the league, but we couldn't score, even against them ! Interestingly, against Norwich our points average per game was 1.55 - not much better. In that case, the statistic proved accurate, we were shit and lost.
One thing's for sure, nothing less than a BIG win will be satisfactory. Even if we do that, it won't hide the inadequacies of this side. Imagine a home game against Q.P.R. being a "must win" scenario. Who'd have thought it ?
"IAWR"
-
26-Oct-2012 17:13 | | Fatso
TheNoider, let's move forward. The loss on Wednesday was just an accident.
"We have to put what happened to us on Wednesday night into perspective - we know we were not at our best, but we have lost one game in 43 home European games. An accident like that can happen" - Wenger
-
26-Oct-2012 21:43 | | MeanLean
TheNoider ,
You make some good comments. I would say though that it is not just a problem for Arsenal fans. Many big clubs have issues with atmospheres at their home stadium.
"However, when as a supporter, you "sing your heart out for the lads", and the players produce insipid, passionless displays such as we have witnessed all too frequently"
Spectrum you are purely your own agenda. It is rubbish that we always produce 'insipid, passionless displays'
More often than not we do very well at home you just have to look at the stats for your answer. Just because you dislike everything to do with Arsenal today please do not assume that those who frequent the ground on a weekly basis feel the same way. We still have one of the largest support in the country. If everyone felt like you then there would be no fans in attendance which is clearly untrue.
TheNoider, If you go away from home you notice a vast difference in noise levels and support for the team. It is the same with pretty much every away support.
-
26-Oct-2012 21:47 | | MeanLean
"No wonder there were chants of "6% you're having a laugh" ringing out around the Emirates. Then there have been / will be, the boos and jeers that result from nothing concrete being done about it. Not hard to empathise with them.
If I was able to attend ( and afford ) the matches, I'd be doing the same"
Makes a whole lot of sense. Basically you are saying, if you could afford to attend then you would go to show how unhappy you are.
I suppose it is like your comments really. You hate everything about modern Arsenal yet you cannot stay away. Well, at least right now.
-
26-Oct-2012 21:58 | | MeanLean
Waterboy,
I agree with just about everything. Our players need continuity and the chop change of them cannot be benefiting them, at least for the short term.
And onto your point to 'desi'gner gooner about chance creation. To be honest I don't think much has changed. Arsene has always had his teams focus solely on their technique to win matches. Many teams play percentages and you can do so when you are playing badly. Our speed of pass and move with the ball is so important and when we lose a little we do not function but when we are on point (Man City away for example) we look very dangerous.
'desi'gner gooner,
You make very good points and I have said many times during my gnashing of teeth, that we are not all of a sudden a bad team, I still think we are in much better shape overall than we have been for a few years now. What is concerning for me is that our game suffers so much when we lose a bit of our momentum. When it goes, we look devoid of ideas. Like I said recently, we need to find a way of scoring and grinding out results when we are not playing well.
-
27-Oct-2012 08:45 | | paspartu
what we need is to get rid of all them posers arsenal fans in the stands and get in some real supporters who sing win lose or draw...oh and a few drums and flares and banners wouldnt hurt either....
we also need to get rid of them jerks at ast who are essentially there to promote usmanov and dein interests...... traitors..scum...
-
27-Oct-2012 11:33 | | Spectrum
Mean Lean @21;43 - I did not say we ALWAYS produce insipid, passionless displays. You did. I said that we produce those displays "ALL TOO FREQUENTLY. " Which if you're honest with yourself, you'd admit is true. And I wasn't merely referring to HOME matches.These ( non ) performances haven't been happening over just the last two matches, you know, they go back a few years. Every team has an off day. But there's a difference between an ordinary off day, and one where the players either aren't trying or don't care. And these in seasons ( no, EVERY season ) when according to Wenger, we're ready to "seriously compete" for the title.
He hypes up our chances each campaign, leading us to expect the team to perform well, then we lose to sides we should easily be beating. Why ? Because of his clueless tactics and inability to motivate. And yet the A.K.B.'s can't understand where we're going wrong. To those with eyes that can see, it's plainly obvious.
He bullshits to us every pre-season that we " have the quality to challenge for the championship " and manages to fool you all into believing him. Then he repeatedly fails to bring in that quality, despite HAVING the funds to do so. We're always left two to three players short of realistically being able to contend, thus handicapping ourselves from the start. Everyone knows that we don't have a world class goalkeeper for instance, EXCEPT Wenger. So we're forced to use Mannone, with predictable results. The man's not only a liar, he's deluded, and wants you to share in his delusion. So far, I'd say it's worked a charm.
"IAWR"
Arsenal News 24/7







Comments (19)